On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.aharoni(a)mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
2013/1/29 Samat <samat78(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Lydia Pintscher
<lydia.pintscher(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Samat <samat78(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree with you.
> > I am also waiting for "somebody", who can change pywiki compatible
with
> > wikidata. I have no time and knowledge
for it, but I have a bot (at
> > least on
> > huwiki, not on wikidata) and I have access to the Hungarian
Toolserver,
so I
could tun this bot for cleaning the wikicode on huwiki and update the
interwiki links on wikidata. But we need a/the "Somebody" first :)
Have you looked at the link I posted? What exactly is missing for you
to do what you want to do?
Cheers
Lydia
Yes, I have.
I mean that interwiki.py should do at least the following:
* delete interwikis from every article where there is no conflict;
* add these interwikis to the relevant page on Wikidata (create this
page if
it doesn't exist yet, change the page if it
already exists).
As I know, the Hungarian editors are doing this tasks now manually.
If there is (are) conflict(s) between interwiki links, it can be the next
step.
Well, actually, I wouldn't think that it is immediately urgent. I
completely understand that this should be done some time soon -
probably in a couple of weeks from now. But it may be a good idea not
to use a bot to immediately remove the links from all the
(non-conflicting) articles until the post-deployment dust settles.
And until the Big Links Remove, if the bots don't re-add the removed
links by force, that should be enough.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore