On 5 March 2016 at 16:15, Markus Krötzsch <markus@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> I agree with Egon that the uniqueness requirement is rather weird. What it
> means is that a thing is only considered an "identifier" if it points to a
> database that uses a similar granularity for modelling the world as
> Wikidata. If the external database is more fine-grained than Wikidata
> (several ids for one item), then it is not a valid "identifier", according
> to the uniqueness idea.
Then we should create a Wikidata item for each concept on that
external database.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata