Hey all, 

I wanted to followup from the Zooniverse comments/thread a couple months back, as part of Pharos's comments about crowd-sourcing depicts statements (https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata/2017-June/010795.html). I met with Zooniverse staff during the week leading up to Wikimania, and was able to get a rough outline of how they might be connected with our ecosystem: 
I am interested in exploring this relationship, because as Structured Data on Commons gains the ability to store structured media file information in the next few years, we have an increased ability to absorb simple descriptive and other crowdsourcing on top of media files, and the Zooniverse community provides access to a very wide group of crowd-contribution interested communities. Moreover, if one of the value statements for uploading to Commons, was a simple access point to Zooniverse Crowdsourcing for either scientific purposes or enriching structured descriptive metadata, we might have a lot more contributions of both scientific and cultural heritage collections to Commons.[2]

If you have a set of media on Commons that you might be interested in testing in the Zooniverse Project Builder, and have some developer capacity, please let me know offlist. We don't need to move quickly on the offer of consultation, but I would like to continue talking with Zooniverse about how to create a better relationship. 

Cheers, 

Alex  

--
Alex Stinson 
GLAM-Wiki Strategist
Wikimedia Foundation
Twitter:@glamwiki/@sadads

[2] I am also keenly aware that any projects that pilot this kind of data enrichment, will require a fair amount of Commons and/or Wikidata community discussion about data quality, and its use.

Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects partner with cultural heritage organizations: http://glamwiki.org