Totally; already threw it at the internal research list :)

On 16 December 2014 at 14:37, Toby Negrin <tnegrin@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Awesome work! Can we distribute in the foundation?

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,

Not sure if this would be interesting to researchers or community members, but: you might remember a paper Stuart and Aaron did a while ago about measuring edit sessions - http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~halfak/publications/Using_Edit_Sessions_to_Measure_Participation_in_Wikipedia/geiger13using-preprint.pdf

To me it's really interesting, because it's (as much as anything else) a new metric for measuring participation, and a metric we can extract additional metrics from (e.g., session length).

As part of some related work on /reader/ sessions, I wrote a pile of code to handle session reconstruction. I've generalised it (it doesn't care if you've got reader timestamps, editor timestamps, or best buy receipt timestamps) and thrown it up at https://github.com/Ironholds/reconstructr . I figure it could be useful to any researchers or community members looking into sessions.

Thanks,

--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation