On Jul 12, 2014 3:26 PM, "Erica Litrenta" <elitrenta
<elitrenta@wikimedia.org>@ <elitrenta(a)wikimedia.org>wikimedia.org
<elitrenta(a)wikimedia.org>> wrote:
I didn't see this mentioned lately, so I thought I
could put this link
here:
https <https://analytics.twitter.com/>://
<https://analytics.twitter.com/>
analytics.twitter.com/
<https://analytics.twitter.com/>
and the related article https
<https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics>
://
<https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics>
blog.twitter.com
<https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics>
/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics
<https://blog.twitter.com/2014/new-tweet-activity-dashboard-offers-richer-analytics>
(so
now we should be able to tell better how well Wiki* tweets performed).
Was mentioned before but easy to miss.
-Jeremy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Tilman Bayer" <tbayer <tbayer@wikimedia.org>@
<tbayer(a)wikimedia.org>
wikimedia.org <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org>>
Date: Jul 1, 2014 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Social-media] Proposed SM for @WikiEval webinars (July 16)
To: "Social media discussion list for Wikimedia projects" <social-media@
<social-media(a)lists.wikimedia.org>lists.wikimedia.org
<social-media(a)lists.wikimedia.org>>
[1] I use short link versions on our account 90% of
times because I think
it might track more clicks. Please feel free to comment on
this! Would love
to hear other views.
We usually avoid these so as to stay reasonably close to the privacy
expectations people have from the wikis. (I'm not too familiar with ow.ly's
capacities, but if they are similar to bit.ly, I could very well imagine
this to be of practical relevance here, as in "oh look, that one person we
know from Madagascar clicked on our link too".) For tracking click numbers
only, Twitter's own stats features should be sufficient; we could share
that number with you in this case.