I'm in favor of +2ing patches but most of open patches have -1 or -2 in their code review part.

Best

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM <info@gno.de> wrote:
A better way would be to commit some patches. There are a lot of proposals which have minor changes and could be approved quickly.

best

xqt

----- Original Nachricht ----
Von:     Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgroup@gmail.com>
An:      Pywikibot discussion list <pywikibot@lists.wikimedia.org>
Datum:   09.02.2016 18:10
Betreff: [pywikibot] Number of open changesets

> Hello,
> Per stats
> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Reports/Changesets_by_project>.
> There are 305 open change sets in pywikibot/core which make us the second
> project after mediawiki/core in number of open change sets. Open change
> sets won't do any harm but sometimes it's hard to find good patches in pool
> of out-of-date-or-not-needed-anymore patches.
>
> Some projects have rules like "if a change set has -2 for more than N
> weeks, it can be abandoned" it can work for us. Also I think if we look
> into our own old patches we might find several patches that are not needed
> anymore due to several reasons such as being implemented another way, too
> big schema change in pywikibot, etc. We can abandon them. Please check your
> old patches.
>
> Best
>
>
> --------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywikibot mailing list
> pywikibot@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot
>