I agree. Our policy for making such a decision may be found here<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal_and_Community_Advocacy/Foundat… (summarized below). I don't anticipate any issue for staff approval. Does anybody on this list object? If not, can someone start a quick RfC? Collaborative Advocacy We collaborate with another organization to take action on a particular policy or political question. - *Example: Signing a petition started by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against Internet censorship.* Review and Approval - *Staff*: General Counsel (approval), CFA (approval), Head of Communications (consultation), and Executive Director (approval) - *Community*: Advocacy Advisory Group (consultation), RfC (consultation if time permits), and General notice - *Board*: Possible consultation On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Mathias Schindler < mathias.schindler(a)wikimedia.de&gt; wrote: -- Geoff Brigham General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 149 New Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94105 +1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6750 gbrigham(a)wikimedia.org *California Registered In-House Counsel* *This message might have confidential or legally privileged information in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.* _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors

And it is still open for signatures. Anyone want to do a quick RFC? On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Luis Villa &lt;lvilla(a)wikimedia.org&gt;

> > I'm looking into whether or not this particular petition is still open

> signatures; if not, I'll at least get us in the loop so that whenever

> organizers take next steps we are alerted and can be involved. > > Luis > > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Geoff Brigham &lt;gbrigham(a)wikimedia.org&gt; > wrote: >> >> I agree. Our policy for making such a decision may be found here >> (summarized below). >> >> I don't anticipate any issue for staff approval. >> >> Does anybody on this list object? >> >> If not, can someone start a quick RfC? >> >> Collaborative Advocacy >> >> We collaborate with another organization to take action on a particular >> policy or political question. >> >> Example: Signing a petition started by the Electronic Frontier

>> against Internet censorship. >> >> Review and Approval >> >> Staff: General Counsel (approval), CFA (approval), Head of

>> (consultation), and Executive Director (approval) >> Community: Advocacy Advisory Group (consultation), RfC (consultation if >> time permits), and General notice >> Board: Possible consultation >> >> >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Mathias Schindler >> &lt;mathias.schindler(a)wikimedia.de&gt; wrote: >>> >>> FYI. (it is my opinion that WMF should support any effort promoting >>> such an amendment to the copyright act) >>> >>> https://law.resource.org/pub/edicts.html >>> >>> TEXT OF THE PETITION >>> >>> To promote access to justice, equal protection, innovation in the >>> legal marketplace, and to codify long-standing public policy, the >>> Copyright Act of the United States, 17 U.S.C., should be amended as >>> follows: >>> >>> “Edicts of government, such as judicial opinions, administrative >>> rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar >>> official legal documents are not copyrightable for reasons of public >>> policy. This applies to such works whether they are Federal, State, or >>> local as well as to those of foreign governments.” >>> >>> This language comes directly from Section 206.01, Compendium of Office >>> Practices II, U.S. Copyright Office (1984). It reflects clear and >>> established Supreme Court precedent on the matter in cases such as >>> Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591 (1834) and Banks v. >>> Manchester, 128 U.S. 244 (1888). The law belongs to the people, who >>> should be free to read, know, and speak the laws by which they choose >>> to govern themselves. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mathias Schindler >>> Projektmanager >>> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. >>> web: http://www.wikimedia.de >>> mail: mathias.schindler(a)wikimedia.de >>> >>> Ceterum censeo opera officiales esse liberandam - >>> http://urheberrecht.wikimedia.de/ >>> >>> Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. >>> V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts >>> Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig >>> anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, >>> Steuernummer 27/681/51985. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list >>> Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Geoff Brigham >> General Counsel >> Wikimedia Foundation >> 149 New Montgomery Street >> San Francisco, CA 94105 >> +1 (415) 839-6885 ext. 6750 >> gbrigham(a)wikimedia.org >> >> California Registered In-House Counsel >> >> This message might have confidential or legally privileged information

>> it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it

>> us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an >> attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal >> advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or

>> members in their personal capacity. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Advocacy_Advisors mailing list >> Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors >> > > > > -- > Luis Villa > Deputy General Counsel > Wikimedia Foundation > 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 > > NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you > have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the > mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical > reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for,

-- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you

received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the

As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. _______________________________________________ Advocacy_Advisors mailing list Advocacy_Advisors(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors