Personally, I'm unfamiliar with any such. Wikipedia's stance, so far as I know, has always been that judgments are copyright free and that other documents are subject to the non-free content policy and guideline. 

Maggie


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Stephen LaPorte <slaporte@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hello all,

Here is a ruling in New York about fair use for legal briefs and other court filings: 
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/02_-_February/Copyright_suit_dismissed_against_Lexis,_Westlaw/

Does anyone know of any recent on-wiki discussions about fair use analysis of court documents?

--
Stephen LaPorte
Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation

This message might have confidential or legally privileged information in it. If you have received this message by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. For legal reasons, I may only serve as an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to or serve as a lawyer for community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.

_______________________________________________
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list
Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors




--
Maggie Dennis
Community Liaison
WikimediaFoundation.org