Thanks, Rob.
I have now asked Ori, Lydia, Timo, and Kunal a few times to reply to
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-July/077554.html re
RCStream. Timo has updated the RfC
https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_comment%2FPublishi…
. Krinkle mentioned to me in IRC:
<Krinkle> sumanah: The RCStream wiki page documents the implemented code.
The code has been implemented, moved into gerrit, reviewed by peers,
approved by ops, and is already live in production. It hasn't been publicly
launched widely, but you can consider it a public beta.
So Tim, if you would like more discussion of the RCStream proposal, it
might be best for you to mention that directly.
Sumana Harihareswara
Senior Technical Writer
Wikimedia Foundation
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Sumana,
I asked around about priorities on RFCs in MediaWiki Core's weekly
meeting. Nothing popped up, but I made it clear that I plan to be
persistent with that question.
I specifically asked about the RCStream RFC, and Tim suggested it does
need more discussion. Link for your convenience:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Publishing_the_RecentCh…
We also briefly discussed Structured Logging. It's mainly blocked on
the Composer RFC. Once that's done, the structured logging RFC seems
to have received adequate review for now; any remaining conversation
can happen in the normal course of code review of the structured
logging implementation, which is pretty much done.
Rob