https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874

Op 18 jan. 2016, om 14:28 heeft Lizzy Jongma <L.Jongma@rijksmuseum.nl> het volgende geschreven:

Dear all,

I noticed that Baglama 2 mentioned a new service: an API. I am under the impression that the API is going to replace the current service. Does anyone know wether this is true? I tried to work with the API but I am not a JSON expert and so far got no understandable data….
Best wishes
Lizzy Jongma, Rijksmuseum
On 18 Jan 2016, at 14:21, Hans Muller <j.m.muller@hccnet.nl> wrote:

Dear all,

Magnus' tool BaGLAMa 2 (detailed Pageview analysis) is extremely valuable
to track interest for GLAM donations, and to convince GLAMs how useful
their donation is or could be.

One question remains:
* Is the bounce (click and immediately/quickly gone) component
included/excluded in the number of pageviews?

I always thought that bounce was included because it is much harder to
exclude it, so i used the numbers with a caveat and only relatively to
each other, but then perhaps the tool tacitly assumes that a pageview only
counts when the dwell time exceeds say ...?? sec?

With Google analytics on other websites one finds that the bounce
component routinely is of the order of 30%, so perhaps for wikimedia sites
the same amount holds.

Perhaps someone knows, thanks and best regards,

User:Hansmuller
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller

PS Example:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/baglama2/#gid=205&month=201512

with many pageviews thanks to the often-clicked article Mumbai


_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools