Hi, Thank you all for your feedback. I've incorporated a number of them and updated the report. It's now publicly available to share with folks who are interested. @Ellie, yes, the 75% retirement part was a typo on my part. Thanks for pointing it out! @Samuel and the group of people talking about how to re-design wikipedia. I don't have a stake in the discussion because I just don't know enough of the backstory on these discussions. But, I do have some hopes about it. I hope the results highlight the importance of taking the kinds of bold action you're suggesting. And, I hope this is the evidence you need for a real conversation about seriously addressing questions of openness and access. Thank you for all of your comments! Jason -- Jason Radford Doctoral Student, Sociology, University of Chicago Visiting Researcher, Lazer Lab, Northeastern University *Connect*: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jsradford>, Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/jsradford>, University of Chicago <http://home.uchicago.edu/%7Ejsradford/> *Play Games for Science at Volunteer Science <http://www.volunteerscience.com>*