While I will agree that many of those articles could use significant improvement, I wouldn't take the assessments all that seriously; a lot of those articles have not been assessed in many years, despite intervening improvements. 
 
Risker


On 16 June 2014 08:58, Toby Hudson <tobyyy@gmail.com> wrote:
I've just wikified this in my userspace if anyone wants to quickly check out our articles on these women.  The good news is that we have an article for each of them.  The bad news is that article quality is pretty grim if these are truly the 100 most powerful women.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:99of9/100powerwomen

Toby/99of9



On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Risker <risker.wp@gmail.com> wrote:

This is a pretty impressive showing for someone just 4 weeks into the job: being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women: http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/

 
Note that increasing diversity is, according to the brief article, a top priority. 
 
Risker/Anne

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap