I confess, I got took link-wise.  I've been trying to ignore the nasty people on Wikipediocracy and was
not sufficiently diligent when one seemed nice. 

Nevertheless, I think it would be problematic if GGTF banned editors in a questionable arbitration
were not permitted to make reasonable suggestions here, as was the implication regarding Neotarf.

I personally don't intend to make a lot, but it's the principle that matters...

On 12/24/2014 11:36 AM, Sarah Stierch wrote:

Please avoid using Examiner articles. Unreliable sources...it's user created content like Wikipedia.

And what Nathan said. Please tread lightly. (From personal experience!!) 

Sarah

On Dec 24, 2014 8:22 AM, "Nathan" <nawrich@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Carol Moore dc <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:

Carol, are you familiar with that author and his history with the projects? He's not exactly an objective journalist (or a journalist of any kind, actually).