Not exactly a recommendation but a suggestion of something to avoid: There are a number of flatbed scanners that have &quot;film scanner&quot; attachments.  If you plan on scanning a lot of negatives I&#39;d suggest not buying something like this because they are typically very slow.  <br>
<br>Then again you might not be able to find something in your price range that is in any way automated.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 03:52, David Gerard <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dgerard@gmail.com">dgerard@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Time to ask this again! (i.e. I&#39;m thinking of spending money on one.)<br>
<br>
What&#39;s the state of affordable negative scanners at this time? I&#39;m<br>
seeing little things that require Windows for £70 or so. Anyone bought<br>
any such device recently?<br>
<br>
<br>
- d.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Commons-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Jon<br>[[User:ShakataGaNai]]<br><a href="http://snowulf.com/">http://snowulf.com/</a> - Blog<br><a href="http://snowulf.imagekind.com/">http://snowulf.imagekind.com/</a> - Pictures<br>
This has been a test of the emergency sig system.  <br><br>