******************************************
__ __ _ _ _ _
/ / /\ \ (_) | _(_)___(_)_ __ ___
\ \/ \/ / | |/ / |_ / | '_ \ / _ \
\ /\ /| | <| |/ /| | | | | __/
\/ \/ |_|_|\_\_/___|_|_| |_|\___|
.org
Year: 2006 Week: 34 Number: 39 Extra BIS
******************************************
An independent internal news bulletin
for the members of the Wikimedia community
//////////////////////////////////////////
=== Board Election 2006 candidates ===
Very soon you will have the opportunity to elect a new board member for the WMF.
To help you to make an informed choice Wikizine presents to you a personal
statement of several candidates. All candidates where invited to send there
statement in. This offer expires on 2006-08-28, 21:00UTC.
This publication is not an endorsement of Wikizine for these candidates.
==== Arno Lagrange ====
I am running as a candidate for the board of trustees in order to defend
linguistic equal rights. We must try to find a way that any person from any
project, speaking any language, can participate in discussions and decisions.
Unfortunately, important discussions/decisions all happen in American English,
making those who are not good speakers of that language unable to take part.
True multilingualism and perspective, provided by an international neutral
auxillary language (it could be Esperanto) is absolutely necessary.
It might seem trivial that in my statement I treat only the language question
and none other. But as long as this important problem is not solved correctly,
it seems impossible for me to look further into any other subject. How does
someone enter a debate on some important subject if, because of a language
barrier, I, like a great many users, cannot understand well what it is about?
There is certainly an effort to develop some amount of multilingualism on meta
(such as, for example, this election) but obviously the majority of the debates
on the pages of meta, by IRC or mailing lists (e.g. Foundation-l) proceed only
in English.
I tried to become interested in certain questions but I am constantly
overwhelmed by long English messages; they lack conciseness, a summary and even
a summary in other languages. One can note that those used to the English
language (whether native speakers or non-native English-speakers accustomed to
using English every day) are totally unaware that they leave behind all those
who do not use the language as well as themselves. They do not make any effort
of conciseness, stuff important messages with unimportant chatter, slang or
jargon, abbreviations (which one finds neither in the dictionary nor
elsewhere). Consequently even with a pretty good level of English it is
impossible to enter the debates when you do not have unlimited time.
Read more;
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Election_candidates_2006/ArnoLagrange/statem…
==== Ross Hedvicek ====
I'm a candidate for the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees. My platform is
not to change anything drastically, but to improve the current situation. For
example - I am aware of cases of blatant abuse of power on several language
branches of Wikipedia in eastern Europe. I made the board aware of these cases.
However, no action was taken by the board. This was not because they weren't
aware of the problems but because of the language barrier preventing them from
making reasonable decisions and possibly due to lack of familiarity with the
history, realities and facts of life in that part of the world. I am more than
qualified to rectify this situation.
My election slogan is: The crap has to stop - vote for me - it is your chance
for change. I have a reputation to uphold!
[[User:Ross.Hedvicek|Ross.Hedvicek]] 18:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
==== Steve Dunlop (UninvitedCompany) =====
I'm a candidate for the Wikimedia Foundation board of directors. I believe that
the board of directors should set up a decisionmaking structure rather than
make individual decisions itself, and to that end I've advocated creating
additional volunteer and paid positions within the Foundation with specific
responsibilities.
I think that would be one means to allow interested people to become active in
their particular areas of interest at the Foundation level. Another of my
proposals is the designation of two Foundation contacts for each project.
Especially for smaller projects, that would be a means to be sure that each
project both has a voice and remains accountable to the overall goals of
openness and NPOV.
I also support long-term independence for various languages as they become large
enough to be self-sustaining. I've been involved at ENWP since March 2003,
where I am a former member of the arbitration committee. I've participated at
meta since before the inception of the Foundation, and am presently involved in
the [[meta:OTRS]] mail handling system.
For more information about my candidacy, you can view my candidate statement
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Election_candidates_2006/En#UninvitedCompany
or the discussion page
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:UninvitedCompany
where I have been replying to questions about my candidacy.
[[User:UninvitedCompany]] 17:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
//////////////////////////////////////////
E-mail: ihavenews AT wikizine DOT org
//////////////////////////////////////////
Wikizine.org makes no guarantee of accuracy,
validity and especially but not limited to,
correct grammar and spelling.
Wikizine.org is not a publication of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Content is available under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Publisher:[[meta:user:Walter]]