It also seems interesting to note that, out of the ten countries included, Wikipedia is #1 in all the developed countries (Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, UK, and US), while YouTube is #1 in all the developing countries (Brasil and Turkey).

I don't have much evidence, but I suspect this points at a general pattern of Wikipedia's dense textual format being less interesting or useful in countries where smaller devices (or possibly other factors like lower education levels) predominate.

On 16 February 2018 at 20:44, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia.org> wrote:

cool, thanks for sending, anything where we're #1 is on-topic :)  I do wonder what these numbers are that they display with each site within each country, it doesn't match any metric we have, so I posted a comment on the site.  

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Jaime Crespo <jcrespo@wikimedia.org> wrote:

I run by chance into this story of SEO analysis of domains- hopefuly this is not offtopic here:

https://blog.searchmetrics.com/us/2018/02/14/seo-world-rankings-2018/

Obviously I don't know how scientific the study is, but there seems to be 2 conclusions regarding Wikimedia- Brazil seems to be behind in Wikipedia adoption (or just Google SEO?), and a big growth of wiktionary.org in the last year.

--

Jaime Crespo

<http://wikimedia.org>

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics